Recently I read a book
called “Economyths” by David Orrell that talked about the limitations of
orthodox economic theory. Here I’d like to share a section that he wrote in the
introduction.
“Economics is a mathematical
representation of human behaviour, and like any mathematical model it is based
on certain assumptions. I will argue, however, that in the case of economics
the assumptions are so completely out of touch with reality, and with the needs
and behavior of most people, that the result is a highly misleading caricature.
The theory is less a science than an ideology. The reason why so many people
are so conned into thinking the assumptions are reasonable is that they are
based on ideas from areas like physics or engineering that are part of our
2,500-year scientific heritage dating back to the ancient Greeks. Superficially
they have the look and feel of real science, but they are counterfeit coin.
To make progress, it’s not
enough to adjust or revise these assumptions. Much work has already been done
in exploring minor variations. Instead, as a Nature article entitled ‘Economics Needs a Scientific Revolution’
put it: ‘We need to break away from classical economics and develop completely
different tools.’ While economics has traditionally modeled itself after
physics and mechanics, the economy has more in common with a living organism
than it does with a machine.”
Hi Kim, I think this is a really great excerpt from the Orrell's book. Can you share some of your thoughts on this book?
ReplyDeleteThanks. I've been following this blog quite closely and have been disappointed that you haven't updated it in a few years.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete